<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Audacity of Hope book review - Part One</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.leapingfromthebox.com/2008/04/14/the-audacity-of-hope-book-review-part-one/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.leapingfromthebox.com/2008/04/14/the-audacity-of-hope-book-review-part-one/</link>
	<description>Leap into relaxed, interest-led learning.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 03:25:59 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Charley</title>
		<link>http://blog.leapingfromthebox.com/2008/04/14/the-audacity-of-hope-book-review-part-one/#comment-298</link>
		<dc:creator>Charley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 12:57:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.leapingfromthebox.com/?p=231#comment-298</guid>
		<description>Oops..."explicitly" 

I KNEW that didn't look right!

Charley</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oops&#8230;&#8221;explicitly&#8221; </p>
<p>I KNEW that didn&#8217;t look right!</p>
<p>Charley</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charley</title>
		<link>http://blog.leapingfromthebox.com/2008/04/14/the-audacity-of-hope-book-review-part-one/#comment-297</link>
		<dc:creator>Charley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 20:01:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.leapingfromthebox.com/?p=231#comment-297</guid>
		<description>Oh...where do I start?! 

How about with the fact that we are NOT a democracy? We are a Representative Republic. There is a huge difference, and the founders explicately rejected democracy as a dangerous form of government! 

How about with the idea that it IS NOT the job of the government to help those who are stuggling in society. That is the job of individuals and of churches...and it has been co-opted by the government under administrations from both sides of the aisle. 

How about the idea that the Constitution IS NOT a living document, nor was it envisioned as such by the founders. To say it is a "living document" means it is malleable and has no jurisdiction over anything because it can be made to say whatever those in power wish it to say. That is a very dangerous thing since it is the Constitution and the Declaration that protect us from the over-reaching power of government.

In short, Obama is at best a socialist, and at worst a Marxist...and has no business leading a country founded in liberty, regardless of his flowery and soaring rhetoric. And for the record...I don't like McCain, either!!!

Charley</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh&#8230;where do I start?! </p>
<p>How about with the fact that we are NOT a democracy? We are a Representative Republic. There is a huge difference, and the founders explicately rejected democracy as a dangerous form of government! </p>
<p>How about with the idea that it IS NOT the job of the government to help those who are stuggling in society. That is the job of individuals and of churches&#8230;and it has been co-opted by the government under administrations from both sides of the aisle. </p>
<p>How about the idea that the Constitution IS NOT a living document, nor was it envisioned as such by the founders. To say it is a &#8220;living document&#8221; means it is malleable and has no jurisdiction over anything because it can be made to say whatever those in power wish it to say. That is a very dangerous thing since it is the Constitution and the Declaration that protect us from the over-reaching power of government.</p>
<p>In short, Obama is at best a socialist, and at worst a Marxist&#8230;and has no business leading a country founded in liberty, regardless of his flowery and soaring rhetoric. And for the record&#8230;I don&#8217;t like McCain, either!!!</p>
<p>Charley</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
